Premium
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Do Women Fare Worse Than Men? Gender Comparison in the INTRINSIC RV Trial
Author(s) -
RUSSO ANDREA M.,
DAY JOHN D.,
STOLEN KIRA,
MULLIN CHRISTOPHER M.,
DORAISWAMY VINAYAK,
LEREW DARIN L.,
OLSHANSKY BRIAN
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01489.x
Subject(s) - medicine , heart failure , diabetes mellitus , population , cardiology , adverse effect , ejection fraction , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , environmental health , endocrinology
: Due to limited enrollment of women in previous trials, there is a paucity of data comparing outcome and arrhythmic events in men versus women with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).Methods and Results : We analyzed outcome of patients in the INTRINSIC RV (Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs) trial based on gender. Women comprised 19% (293/1530) of the INTRINSIC RV population. Compared with men, women were less likely to have coronary disease, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and hyperlipidemia, and were more likely to have congestive heart failure and diabetes. Women were less likely to receive beta blockers and ACE inhibitors, and more likely to receive diuretics. Over 10.8 ± 3.5 months of follow‐up, unadjusted mortality was higher in women than men (6.8% vs 4.1%, P = 0.04). Heart failure hospitalizations occurred in 7.9% of women versus 5.7% of men (P = 0.13). After adjustment for baseline differences and drug therapy, there was no significant difference in mortality between men and women. Adverse events were observed more often in women. There were no gender differences in the percentage of patients receiving appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks.Conclusions : In INTRINSIC RV, women receiving ICDs differed from men regarding baseline characteristics and drug therapy. After adjusting for baseline differences and medical therapy, there were no differences in heart failure hospitalization, survival, or ICD shock therapy during follow‐up. Apparent undertreatment of heart failure and greater frequency of adverse advents in women receiving ICDs warrant further investigation.