Premium
Radiofrequency Catheter Selection Based on Cavotricuspid Angiography Compared with a Control Group with an Externally Cooled‐Tip Catheter: A Randomized Pilot Study
Author(s) -
DA COSTA ANTOINE,
ROMEYERBOUCHARD CÉCILE,
JAMON YANN,
BISCH LAURENCE,
ISAAZ KARL
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01367.x
Subject(s) - medicine , catheter , selection (genetic algorithm) , catheter ablation , cardiology , radiology , atrial fibrillation , artificial intelligence , computer science
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)‐dependent atrial flutter (AFL) can be performed using either externally cooled‐tip RFA catheters or large‐tip (8 mm) catheters. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that the efficacy of both catheters may vary with CTI anatomy and catheters orientation. Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate: a RFA catheter selection based on CTI angiography compared with a control group with an externally cooled‐tip catheter together with the risk of an expensive crossover catheter in both groups. Method: Over a period of 16 months, 119 patients were included and randomized. Results: When comparing the angiographic group (n = 56) and the externally cooled‐tip RFA catheter group (n = 63), the duration of application time with a median of 7 min (interquartile range 4.5–11) versus a median of 10 min (interquartile range 6–20; P = 0.008) and the duration of X‐ray exposure with a median of 7 min (interquartile range 4–10) versus a median of 10 min (interquartile range 5–15; P = 0.025) were significantly lower in the angiographic group versus externally cooled‐tip catheter group. Furthermore, the number of catheters crossover was significantly higher in the angiographic group versus externally cooled‐tip catheter group I (27% vs 7%; P = 0.007). Conclusions: This study shows that a strategy with a catheter selection based on a CTI angiographic evaluation is superior to an empirical use of an externally cooled‐tip catheter during CTI RFA. Thus, angiographic isthmus evaluation predicts the effectiveness of a RFA catheter and the risk of an expensive catheter crossover.