Premium
Variability in Post‐Pacing Intervals Predicts Global Atrial Activation Pattern During Tachycardia
Author(s) -
COLOMBOWALA ILYAS K.,
MASSUMI ALI,
RASEKH ABDI,
SAEED MOHAMMAD,
CHENG JIE,
FAKHRI BITA,
SHURAIH MOSSAAB,
RAZAVI MEHDI
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01029.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ablation , atrial tachycardia , coronary sinus , tachycardia , catheter ablation , atrial fibrillation
Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post‐pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia.Methods and Results:Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5‐second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro‐reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 ± 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 ± 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of ≤10 ms and ≥30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity.Conclusions:Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia.