Premium
Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with AV Block (BLOCK HF): Clinical Study Design and Rationale
Author(s) -
CURTIS ANNE B.,
ADAMSON PHILIP B.,
CHUNG EUGENE,
JOHN SUTTON MARTIN ST.,
TANG FENG,
WORLEY SETH
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00907.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , heart failure , heart block , atrioventricular block , randomized controlled trial , ventricular pacing , electrocardiography
Background: Right ventricular (RV) pacing restores ventricular systole in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block, yet recent studies have suggested that in patients with AV block and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, RV pacing may exacerbate the progression to heart failure (HF). BLOCK HF is a prospective, multi‐center, randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial designed to determine whether patients with AV block, LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 50%), and mild to moderate HF (NYHA I‐III) who require pacing benefit from biventricular (BiV) pacing, compared with RV pacing alone. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether the time to first event (all‐cause mortality, heart failure‐related urgent care, or a ≥ 15% increase in left ventricular end systolic volume index [LVESVI]) for patients with BiV pacing is superior to that of patients with RV pacing. Methods: Patients with AV block and LV dysfunction who require permanent pacing and undergo successful implantation of a commercial Medtronic CRT device, with or without an ICD, will be randomized to BiV or RV pacing. Patients are followed at least every 6 months until study closure. Up to 1,636 patients may be enrolled in 150 centers worldwide. Conclusion: BLOCK HF is a large, randomized, clinical study in pacing‐indicated patients with AV block, mild to moderate HF symptoms, and LV dysfunction to determine whether BiV pacing is superior to RV pacing in slowing the progression of HF.