Premium
Interatrial Conduction Measured During Biventricular Pacemaker Implantation Accurately Predicts Optimal Paced Atrioventricular Intervals
Author(s) -
LEVIN VADIM,
NEMETH MARGIT,
COLOMBOWALA ILYAS,
MASSUMI ALI,
RASEKH ABDI,
CHENG JIE,
COLES JAMES A.,
UJHELYI MICHAEL R.,
RAZAVI MEHDI
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00744.x
Subject(s) - medicine , coronary sinus , cardiology , sinus rhythm , atrial fibrillation , anesthesia
Background: Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay during biventricular (BiV) pacemaker implantation can require substantial resources. Hence, a simpler method is desirable. We hypothesized that interatrial conduction time (IACT), measured at the time of BiV device implant, could be a surrogate value for the optimal AV delay. Objective: This study determined the relationship between paced IACT and the optimal paced AV delay (PAV), as determined by echocardiography. Methods: Consecutive subjects (N = 25; age = 66 ± 10 years; M/F: 17/8) undergoing BiV pacemaker implantation and in sinus rhythm were included. Cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) was at the operator's discretion. A quadripolar electrophysiology catheter was inserted via the guiding sheath into the inferiolateral CS to measure left atrial depolarization. The IACT was calculated as the interval between right atrial stimulation artifact and earliest deflection on the coronary sinus catheter electrogram. Subsequently, during atrial pacing the PAV was determined using transmitral pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography (iterative method). The relationship between paced IACT and PAV was then determined. Results: The mean ± SD paced IACT and PAV were 126 ± 25 msec and 157 ± 23 msec, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the paced IACT and PAV (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). The equation describing the relationship was PAV = 0.68 * (IACT + 104) msec. Conclusions: The paced IACT has a strong correlation with the echo derived optimal PAV. This method may be used to program PAV intervals without need for echocardiography in patients undergoing BiV pacemaker implantation.