Electrophysiologic Deterioration After One‐Minute Fibrillation Increases Relative Biphasic Defibrillation Efficacy

Biphasic Shocks and One‐Minute Fibrillation. Introduction: The probability of survival decreases to 70% after 2 minutes of ventricular fibriltation. Bipliasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks in terminating short‐duration (<30 sec) ventricular fibrillation. We tested the hypotheses that developing ischemia changes the electrophysiologic characteristics of fibrillation and that the relative efficacy of biphasic shocks increases as electrophysiologic characteristics deteriorate. Methods and Results: Monophasic (12 msec) and biphasic (6/6 msec) shocks (1 to 4 A) were tested in random order in isolated rabbit hearts after 1‐minute ischemic fibrillation. Monophasic action potentials showed only a sporadic occurrence of electrical diastole after 5 seconds of fibrillation (24% of action potentials in the right ventricle and 18% in the left ventricle). After 60 seconds of fibrillation, diastole (17.83 ± 1.14 msec in the right ventricle and 21.52 ± 1.16 msec in the left ventricle) appeared after almost every action potential (P < 0.0001 compared with 5 sec), despite a lack of change in fibrillation cycle length and dominant frequency. Monophasie I 50 was 2.89 A, and biphasic I 50 was 1.4 A (77% reduction in energy). Normalized curve width decreased 28%. Retrospective analysis showed that shocks delivered early in the fibrillation action potential bad a greater probability of succeeding (89%) than shocks delivered late (30%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: After l‐minute ischemic fibrillation, diastolic intervals occur during fibrillation. Therefore, defibrillation shocks have an approximately 29% probability of interacting with the fibrillation action potential during diastole. At this time, biphasic shocks produced a more deterministic defibrillation threshold and became even more efficacious (I 50 B/M = 0.48) than at short fibrillation durations (I 50 B/M = 0.7).