Premium
Differential Effects of Parasympathetic Blockade and Parasympathetic Withdrawal on Heart Rate Variability
Author(s) -
CHALLAPALLI SRIDEVI,
KADISH ALAN H.,
HORVATH GEORGE,
GOLDBERGER JEEFREY J.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00295.x
Subject(s) - atropine , medicine , parasympathetic nervous system , baroreflex , blockade , heart rate variability , heart rate , anesthesia , cardiology , autonomic nervous system , blood pressure , receptor
Parasympathetic Withdrawal and Blockade Effects on HRV. introduction : Low heart rate variability (HRV) has been shown to have important prognostic significance in multiple settings. Although this is believed to reflect reduced parasympathetic tone, the physiology of reduced parasympathetic tone has not been elucidated. Methods and Results : To evaluate whether parasympathetic withdrawal and partial parasympathetic blockade result in similar changes in HRV, 27 normal volunteers underwent complete β‐adrenergic blockade and then were given (1) graded doses of nitroprusside to achieve baroreflex‐mediated parasympathetic withdrawal and (2) low‐dose atropine (0.01 mg/kg) to achieve partial parasympathetic blockade. Five‐minute ECG recordings were obtained for HRV analysis. In 19 subjects, paired 5‐minute recordings from each condition were available with mean RR intervals that differed by < 50 msec (low‐dose atropine: 869 ± 96 msec and nitroprusside 875 ± 99 msec). The root mean square of the successive RR interval differences was lower following low‐dose atropine than following parasympathetic withdrawal with nitroprusside (16 ± 11 msec vs 22 ± 15 msec; P < 0.02). During parasympathetic withdrawal, the low‐frequency (LF) power was 0.917 ± 0.602 bpm 2 and the high‐frequency (HF) power was 0.501 ± 0.521 bpm 2 . During partial parasympathetic blockade, the LF and HF powers were significantly lower (0.443 ± 0.474 bpm 2 , P < 0.005; and 0.198 ± 0.207 bpm 2 , P < 0.02). Conclusion : These data confirm that HRV reflects the character of parasympathetic modulation of the heart rate rather than parasympathetic tone per se. Furthermore, this study identifies two distinct physiologic explanations for the finding of low HRV, namely, diminished vagal discharge and resistance of cardiac muscarinic receptors to vagal discharge. Further delineation of the relationships between parasympathetic tone and HRV will allow for better understanding of the pathophysiologic derangements associated with low HRV.