Premium
Why a Large Tip Electrode Makes a Deeper Radiofrequency Lesion:
Author(s) -
OTOMO KENICHIRO,
YAMANASHI WILLIAM S.,
TONDO CLAUDIO,
ANTZ MATTHIAS,
BUSSEY JONATHAN,
PITHA JAN V.,
ARRUDA MAURICIO,
NAKAGAWA HIROSHI,
WITTKAMPE FRED H.M.,
LAZZARA RALPH,
JACKMAN WARREN M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00866.x
Subject(s) - medicine , lesion , radiofrequency ablation , electrode , cardiology , ablation , surgery , chemistry
Increase in RF Lesion Depth with Larger Electrode. Introduction : Increasing electrode size allows an increase in radiofrequency lesion depth. The purpose of this study was to examine the roles of added electrode cooling and electrode‐tissue interface area in producing deeper lesions. Methods and Results : In 10 dogs, the thigh muscle was exposed and superfused with heparinized blood. An 8‐French catheter with 4‐ or 8‐mm tip electrode was positioned against the muscle with a blood flow of 350 mL/min directed around the electrode. Radiofrequency current was delivered using four methods: (1) electrode perpendicular to the muscle, using variable voltage to maintain the electrode‐tissue interface temperature at 60°C; (2) same except the surrounding blood was stationary; (3) perpendicular electrode position, maintaining tissue temperature (3.5‐mm depth) at 90°C; and (4) electrode parallel to the muscle, maintaining tissue temperature at 90°C. Electrode‐tissue interface temperature, tissue temperature (3.5‐ and 7.0‐mm depths), and lesion size were compared between the 4‐ and 8‐mm electrodes in each method. In Methods 1 and 2, the tissue temperatures and lesion depth were greater with the 8‐mm electrode. These differences were smaller without blood flow, suggesting the improved convective cooling of the larger electrode resulted in greater power delivered to the tissue at the same electrode‐tissue interface temperature. In Method 3 (same tissue current density), the electrode‐tissue interface temperature was significantly lower with the 8‐mm electrode. With parallel orientation and same tissue temperature at 3.5‐mm depth (Method 4), the tissue temperature at 7.0‐mm depth and lesion depth were greater with the 8‐mm electrode, suggesting increased conductive heating due to larger volume of resistive heating because of the larger electrode‐tissue interface area. Conclusion : With a larger electrode, both increased cooling and increased electrode‐tissue interface area increase volume of resistive heating and lesion depth.