Premium
Significant Reduction of Atrial Defibrillation Threshold and Inducibility by Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Author(s) -
HWANG EUISEOCK,
NAM GI BYUNG,
JOUNG BOYOUNG,
PARK JUNBEOM,
LEE JIHEI SARA,
SHIM JAEMIN,
UHM JAESUN,
LEE MOON HYOUNG,
PAK HUINAM
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03517.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , catheter ablation , ablation , atrial fibrillation , tachycardia , defibrillation threshold , atrial tachycardia , cardioversion , defibrillation , anesthesia
Background:Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has antiarrhythmic effects by multiple mechanisms. We hypothesized that RFCA curtails atrial defibrillation threshold (A‐DFT) and postablation induction pacing cycle length (iPCL), making critical mass reduction one potential mechanism by which antiarrhythmic effect is achieved.Methods:We included 289 patients with AF (male 77.9%, 55.7 ± 10.8 years old; 197 paroxysmal AF: 92 persistent AF) who underwent RFCA. A‐DFT (serial internal cardioversion 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 J) and iPCL (serial 10 mA 10‐second atrial pacing with pacing cycle length 250, 200, 190, 180, 170, 160, and 150 ms) were evaluated before and after RFCA.Results:(1) RFCA of AF reduced the A‐DFT from 6.7 ± 3.7 J to 3.0 ± 3.0 J (P < 0.001). (2) AF ablation reduced AF inducibility from 95.4% before the procedure to 56.3% after the procedure (P < 0.001), and the iPCL from 194.8 ± 32.6 to 160.9 ± 26.2 ms (P < 0.001). (3) In patients who underwent a greater number of ablation lines, the post‐RFCA A‐DFT (P < 0.001) was lower, and %ΔA‐DFT (P = 0.003) and proportion of atrial tachycardia (P = 0.022) were higher than those with a lower number of ablation lines.Conclusion:AF ablation significantly reduced A‐DFT, AF inducibility, and iPCL, and the degree of their reduction was related to the number of ablation lines. (PACE 2012;35:1428–1435)