z-logo
Premium
How to Avoid Development of AV block during RF Ablation: Anatomical and Electrophysiological Analyses at the Time of AV Node Ablation
Author(s) -
GONDO TAKEKI,
YOSHIDA TERUHISA,
INAGE TOMOHITO,
TAKEUCHI TOMOHIRO,
FUKUDA YUJIRO,
TAKII EIICHI,
HARAGUCHI GO,
IMAIZUMI TSUTOMU
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03393.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ablation , electrophysiology , atrioventricular node , radiofrequency ablation , ventricle , cardiology , nuclear medicine , atrioventricular block , tachycardia
Background:With an aim to identify risk factors that can serve for prevention of atrioventricular (AV) block (AVB) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation, we conducted anatomical and electrophysiological investigations at the time of AV node ablation (AVNA).Methods and Results:Ten patients who underwent AVNA were enrolled. RF energy was delivered from posterior region of septal annulus of the tricuspid valve to the His bundle potential (HBP) recording site using a stepwise approach. In each delivery, atrial/ventricle potential amplitude ratio (A/V ratio), HBP, and juctional ectopy (JE) that appeared during RF delivery were evaluated. Furthermore, fluoroscopic distance between ablation site and HBP recording site (anatomical H‐ABL distance) and electrophysiological H‐ABL interval were measured. HBP was recorded in 25 of total 70 RF deliveries. When HBP was recorded, the A/V ratio was significantly greater in the group with AVB than without AVB (1.6 ± 2.3 mV vs 0.1 ± 0.2 mV, P = 0.02). The minimum cycle length (CL) of JE was significantly shorter in the group with AVB than without AVB (438 ± 112 ms vs 557 ± 178, ms, P = 0.04). AVB developed frequently when H‐ABL distance was less than 15 mm from right anterior oblique view 30° and 12 mm from left anterior oblique view 45° and when H‐ABL interval was less than 10 ms. AVB did not develop over the above values.Conclusions:HBP with high A/V ratio, JE with short CL, short H‐ABL distance, and short H‐ABL interval of less than 10 ms should be avoided to prevent AVB during RF ablation at the near site of AV node. (PACE 2012;XX:1–7)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here