Premium
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: “Perpetual Motion” of Open Irrigated Tip Catheters at 50 W Is Safe and Improves Outcomes
Author(s) -
WINKLE ROGER A.,
MEAD R. HARDWIN,
ENGEL GREGORY,
PATRAWALA ROB A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02990.x
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , ablation , fluoroscopy , catheter ablation , cardiology , catheter , surgery , nuclear medicine
Background: Point‐by‐point use of open irrigated tip catheters (OITCs) at 50 W increases atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation cure rates but also increases complications. We determined if constantly moving the OITC (perpetual motion) when using 50 W increases ablation cure rates without increasing complications.Methods: We evaluated procedural data, complications, and individual procedure cure rates (IPCRs) for AF ablation using closed tip catheters (CTC) versus OITC at 40, 45, and 50 W in 1,122 ablations. We used “perpetual motion” to move the OITC at 50 W every 3–10 seconds.Results: The OITC showed higher IPCR than CTC at 45 W (P = 0.012) and 50 W (P < 0.0005). For the OITC, IPCR increased from 44.6% to 60.7% as power increased from 40 to 50 W (P = 0.008). The OITC appeared superior to the CTC for all types of AF. For paroxysmal AF, increasing OITC power from 40 to 50 W provided no increase in IPCR (70.6% vs 71.2%, P = 0.827). For persistent AF, increasing power from 40 to 50 W increased IPCR from 34.5% to 59.5% (P = 0.001). Complications were similar for the CTC and the OITC at any power. The OITC at 50 W had shorter procedure, left atrial, and fluoroscopy times (P < 0.0005).Conclusions: Increasing OITC power from 40 to 50 W increases IPCR with no increase in complications as long as the 50 W setting is done using “perpetual motion.” The OITC 50 W power setting results in shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and should be considered for AF ablations. (PACE 2011; 34:531–539)