Premium
Different Image Integration Modalities to Guide AF Ablation: Impact on Procedural and Fluoroscopy Times
Author(s) -
PRATOLA CLAUDIO,
BALDO ELISA,
ARTALE PAOLO,
MARCANTONI LINA,
TOSELLI TIZIANO,
PERCOCO GIANFRANCO,
SASSONE BIAGIO,
FERRARI ROBERTO
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02989.x
Subject(s) - medicine , fluoroscopy , ablation , atrial fibrillation , magnetic resonance imaging , catheter ablation , nuclear medicine , radiology
Background: Different image integration modalities are available for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but their impact on procedural and fluoroscopy times has not been evaluated yet.Methods: Sixty patients (mean age 52.2 ± 12.0 years, 48.3% men, 75% paroxysmal AF) undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) encircling with PV disconnection for symptomatic drug‐refractory AF were randomized to ablation with CARTO electroanatomical mapping (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) integrated with: (1) preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Group 1); (2) intracardiac echocardiography (ICE; Group 2); (3) preprocedural MRI and ICE (Group 3).Results: PV disconnection was achieved in all patients. Total procedural time (Group 1: 124.7 ± 47.0; Group 2: 112.5 ± 30.4; Group 3: 108.6 ± 34.7 minutes) and total ablation time were similar between groups (P = ns). MRI integration alone required a higher fluoroscopy time (23.8 ± 6.9 in Group 1 vs 11.0 ± 2.3 and 13.9 ± 4.2 minutes in Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.005) and a longer time spent in the left atrium (109.0 ± 43.5 in Group 1 vs 78.2 ± 29.7 and 74.8 ± 34.3 minutes in Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P = 0.03) in comparison to ICE integration. Addition of MRI to ICE integration showed a tendency for a higher fluoroscopy time in comparison to ICE integration alone (P = 0.06). At a mean follow‐up of 9.1 ± 2.2 months, there were no significant differences in AF recurrences among the groups (P = ns) .Conclusion: ICE image integration significantly reduces the fluoroscopy time and the time spent in the left atrium in comparison to MRI integration alone. Addition of MRI to ICE integration does not reduce total procedural time and seems to lead to higher fluoroscopy time in comparison to ICE integration alone. (PACE 2011; 34:422–430)