Premium
X‐ray Radiation Causes Electromagnetic Interference in Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers
Author(s) -
HIROSE MINORU,
TACHIKAWA KEIICHI,
OZAKI MASANORI,
UMEZAWA NAOKI,
SHINBO TOSHIHIRO,
KOKUBO KENICHI,
KOBAYASHI HIROSUKE
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02846.x
Subject(s) - medicine , electromagnetic interference , interference (communication) , radiation , cardiology , medical physics , optics , electrical engineering , physics , engineering , channel (broadcasting)
Background: X‐rays are not thought to cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in implantable cardiac pacemakers. However, x‐ray radiation during computed tomography (CT) scanning has been reported to cause EMI in some implantable cardiac pacemakers. The objectives of this study were to identify the location within the pacemakers where x‐ray radiation causes EMI and to investigate the association of EMI with the x‐ray radiation conditions.Methods: We verified the location where x‐ray radiation caused EMI using a CT scanner and conventional radiographic x‐ray equipment. An inhibition test and an asynchronous test were performed using five types of implantable cardiac pacemakers.Results: X‐ray radiation inhibited the pacing pulses of four types of implantable cardiac pacemakers when the body of each implantable cardiac pacemaker, containing a complementary metal‐oxide semiconductor (CMOS), was scanned using a CT scanner. We confirmed that x‐ray‐induced EMI depends on the x‐ray radiation conditions, that is, the tube voltage, tube current, x‐ray dose, and direction of x‐ray radiation, as well as the sensing thresholds of the implantable cardiac pacemakers.Conclusions: X‐ray radiation caused EMI in some implantable cardiac pacemakers, probably because the CMOS component was irradiated. The occurrence of EMI depended on the pacemaker model, sensing threshold of the pacemaker, and x‐ray radiation conditions. (PACE 2010; 33:1174–1181)