Initial Experience of Pacing with a Lumenless Lead System in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Background: Long‐term pacing is frequently necessary in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Preservation of ventricular function and avoidance of venous occlusion is important in these patients. Site‐selective pacing with a smaller diameter lead is achievable with the model 3830 lead (SelectSecure®, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), which was specifically designed to target these complications. We describe our initial experience with the Model 3830 lead in patients with CHD.Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing site‐selective implantation of a Model 3830 lead(s) from two congenital heart centers (Bristol, UK, and Dublin, Ireland) from October 2004 until February 2008.Results: We implanted 139 SelectSecure® leads (atrial n = 70; ventricular n = 69) in 90 patients (57 male) with CHD. Median age at implantation: 13.4 years (1.1–59.2 years), median weight: 43 kg. Sixty‐nine patients (76%) were children (<18 years). Indications for lead implantation included atrioventricular block (n = 55), sinus node disease (n = 18), implantable cardiac defibrillator (n = 12), antitachycardia pacing (n = 4), and cardiac resynchronization (n = 1). Twenty‐two patients underwent pre‐existing lead extraction during the same procedure. All the attempted procedures resulted in successful pacing. One patient had a significantly raised threshold at implantation. There was no procedural mortality. There were two procedural complications. Three patients required lead repositioning for increasing thresholds early postprocedure (<6 weeks). Four leads (2.9%) had displaced on median follow‐up of 21.8 months (0.5–42 months).Conclusions: The Model 3830 lead is safe and effective in patients with CHD. This is a technically challenging patient group yet procedural complication and lead displacement rates are acceptable.