Premium
Discriminatory Therapy for Very Fast Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Author(s) -
SIVAGANGABALAN GOPAL,
ESHOO SUZANNE,
EIPPER VICKI E.,
THIAGALINGAM ARAVINDA,
KOVOOR PRAMESH
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01147.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , shock (circulatory) , tachycardia , ventricular tachycardia , ventricular fibrillation , heart rate , ejection fraction , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , defibrillation , heart failure , blood pressure
Objectives:We assessed the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and low‐energy (5J) shock for very fast ventricular tachycardia (VFVT), cycle length 200–250 ms, in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).Methods and Results:One hundred and fifty‐two consecutive patients with standard indications for ICD therapy were enrolled. Before discharge from the hospital each patient had an electrophysiological study (EPS) performed through the device, to assess the efficacy of ATP and low‐joule shock at terminating VFVT. Initial therapy for VFVT consisted of three bursts of ATP followed by low‐energy shock, and high‐energy shocks as required. The mean age of enrolled patients was 63 ± 13 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31 ± 13%. During the predischarge EPS, a total of 125 VT episodes were induced in 64 patients. In patients with VFVT, the success rate of ATP was 30% (14/46), the acceleration rate was 26% (12/46), and the success rate of low‐energy shock was 86% (25/29). In patients with fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT), cycle lengths 251–320 ms, the success rate of ATP was 62% (24/39), the acceleration rate was 18% (7/39), and the success rate of low‐energy shock was 94% (17/18).Conclusions:This study has demonstrated for the first time that ATP and low‐energy shock are effective, as an alternative to high‐energy shock, to revert induced VFVT. Low‐energy shock has a very high success rate for VT slower than VFVT. Clinical studies are required prior to consideration for empiric programming.