Premium
Comparison of Two Strategies to Reduce Ventricular Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
Author(s) -
PÜRERFELLNER HELMUT,
BRANDT JOHAN,
ISRAEL CARSTEN,
SHELDON TODD,
JOHNSON JAMES,
TSCHELIESSNIGG KARLHEINZ,
SPERZEL JOHANNES,
BORIANI GIUSEPPE,
PUGLISI ANDREA,
MILASINOVIC GORAN
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00965.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ventricular pacing , atrioventricular block , cardiology , cardiac pacing , anesthesia , heart failure
Background:Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) and Search AV+ (SAV+) are two pacing algorithms designed to reduce ventricular pacing. MVP promotes conduction by operating in AAI/R mode with backup ventricular pacing during atrioventricular block (AVB). SAV+ operates in DDD/R mode with a nominal AV extension of 290 ms during atrial sensing and 320 ms during atrial pacing. The reduction in ventricular pacing was compared with these two algorithms in pacemaker patients.Methods:The EnRhythm and EnPulse clinical studies assessed the percentage of ventricular pacing (%VP) after 1 month. Each patient's AVB status was assigned using the following hierarchical categories: persistent third‐degree AVB (p3AVB), episodic third‐degree AVB (e3AVB), second‐degree AVB (2AVB), first‐degree AVB (1AVB), and no AVB (nAVB). The%VP was tabulated for each AVB status category.Results:Data were available from 322 patients of whom 129 received DDD(R) pacing with the MVP algorithm activated and 193 patients with DDD(R) pacing and the SAV+ function activated, each for a month period. MVP resulted in a significantly lower median%VP than SAV+ in all AVB categories except for p3AVB: nAVB (0.3 vs 2.9, P < 0.0001), 1AVB (0.9% vs 80.6%, P < 0.0001), 2AVB (37.6 vs 99.3, P< 0.002), e3AVB (1.2 vs 42.2, P = 0.02), p3AVB (98.9 vs 100, P = 1.00).Conclusion:MVP resulted in a greater reduction in%VP than SAV+ across all patient groups except persistent third‐degree AV block. The greatest reduction in%VP was observed in patients with mildly impaired AV conduction.