z-logo
Premium
Incidence and Significance of Far‐Field R Wave Sensing in a VDD‐Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Author(s) -
EBERHARDT FRANK,
SCHUCHERT ANDREAS,
SCHMITZ DIETMAR,
ZERM THOMAS,
MITZENHEIM SABINE,
WIEGAND UWE KH
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00681.x
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , cardiology , ventricular tachycardia , tachycardia , incidence (geometry) , single chamber , atrial tachycardia , lead (geology) , sinus tachycardia , atrial fibrillation , catheter ablation , physics , optics , geomorphology , geology
Background: A VDD‐implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) provides atrioventricular (AV) synchronous stimulation when necessary and incorporates the advantages of dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms both at potentially lower costs and less periprocedural complications than a DDD‐ICD system. A prerequisite for correct dual chamber ICD function is reliable atrial sensing.Methods: We evaluated atrial near‐ and ventricular far‐field sensing and its impact on the dual‐chamber detection algorithm in 106 patients with a single‐lead VDD‐ICD during a 12‐month follow‐up period.Results: Six hundred and thirty‐nine follow‐ups were included. Mean near‐field amplitude was 3.82 ± 1.76 mV; mean far‐field amplitude was 0.31 ± 0.15 mV. 46% of patients had far‐fields >0.35 mV and 35% of patients showed atrial EGM markers corresponding to a ventricular far‐field in at least one follow‐up. Six hundred and forty‐five tachycardia episodes were evaluated. Due to far‐field sensing, three of 66 episodes (4.5%) of sinus tachycardia were misclassified as ventricular tachycardia (VT), leading to antitachycardia therapies. Delayed detection of VT was seen in a 12 of 323 episodes (3.7%) in five of 62 patients (8%) having VT events (delay 6.4 ± 6.0 seconds (range 2–24 seconds)). Stable far‐field amplitudes <0.2 mV in a follow‐up had a high negative predictive value for the occurrence of malfunction during tachycardia—conversely, high far‐field amplitudes or a high incidence of far‐field markers are only moderately correlated with malfunction.Conclusions: Ventricular far‐field sensing in a VDD‐ICD is not uncommon, however, tachycardia detection by the dual chamber algorithm is not seriously impaired by far‐field sensing.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here