Premium
Using the Upper Limit of Vulnerability to Assess Defibrillation Efficacy at Implantation of ICDs
Author(s) -
SWERDLOW CHARLES D.,
SHEHATA MICHAEL,
CHEN PENGSHENG
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00659.x
Subject(s) - defibrillation , defibrillation threshold , medicine , ventricular fibrillation , cardiology , shock (circulatory) , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , fibrillation , atrial fibrillation
The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock strength at or above which ventricular fibrillation (VF) is not induced when the shock is delivered during the vulnerable period. The ULV, a measurement made in regular rhythm, provides an estimate of the minimum shock strength required for reliable defibrillation that is as accurate or more accurate than the defibrillation threshold (DFT). The ULV hypothesis of defibrillation postulates a mechanistic relationship between the ULV—measured during regular rhythm—and the minimum shock strength that defibrillates reliably. Vulnerability testing can be applied at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant to confirm a clinically adequate defibrillation safety margin without inducing VF in 75%–95% of ICD recipients. Alternatively, the ULV provides an accurate patient‐specific safety margin with a single fibrillation–defibrillation episode. Programming first ICD shocks based on patient‐specific measurements of ULV rather than programming routinely to maximum output shortens charge time and may reduce the probability of syncope as ICDs age and charge times increase. Because the ULV is more reproducible than the DFT, it provides greater statistical power for clinical research with fewer episodes of VF. Limited evidence suggests that vulnerability testing is safer than conventional defibrillation testing.