z-logo
Premium
Improved Extraction of ePTFE and Medical Adhesive Modified Defibrillation Leads from the Coronary Sinus and Great Cardiac Vein
Author(s) -
WILKOFF BRUCE L.,
BELOTT PETER H.,
LOVE CHARLES J.,
SCHEINER AVRAM,
WESTLUND RANDY,
RIPPY MARIAN,
KRISHNAN MOHAN,
NORLANDER BARRY E.,
STEINHAUS BRUCE,
EMMANUEL JANSON,
ZELLER PETER J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40029.x
Subject(s) - medicine , defibrillation , coronary sinus , jugular vein , vein , dissection (medical) , sinus (botany) , surgery , cardiology , botany , biology , genus
Background: Permanent leads with shocking coils for defibrillation therapy are sometimes implanted in the coronary sinus (CS) and great cardiac vein (GCV). These shocking coils, as documented by pathologic examination of animal investigations, often become tightly encapsulated by fibrosis and can be very difficult to remove.Methods: One of three configurations of the Guidant model 7109 Perimeter ® coronary sinus shocking lead was implanted into the distal portion of the GCV of 24 sheep for up to 14 months. Group 1 had unmodified coils (control), group 2 had coils backfilled with medical adhesive (MA), and Group 3 had coils coated with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). Eighteen leads, three from each group at 6 and 14 months were transvenously extracted from the left jugular vein. The remaining six animals were not subject to extraction. All animals were euthanized for pathological and microscopic examination.Results: All six of the control, three of the MA, and one of the ePTFE leads required the use of an electrosurgical dissection sheath (EDS) for extraction. Five control, two MA, and none of the ePTFE leads had significant fibrotic attachments to the shocking coils. Significant trauma was observed at necropsy for those leads requiring the use of the EDS for extraction.Conclusions: Tissue ingrowth is a major impediment to the removal of defibrillation leads implanted in the CS and GCV of sheep. Reduction of tissue ingrowth by coating the shocking coils with ePTFE or by backfilling with MA facilitates transvenous lead removal with reduced tissue trauma.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here