Premium
Long‐Term Performance of Screw‐In Atrial Pacing Leads: A Randomized Comparison of J‐Shaped and Straight Leads
Author(s) -
LURIA DAVID,
BARLEV DAVID,
GUREVITZ OSNAT,
GRANIT HAVA,
ROTSTEIN ZEEV,
ELDAR MICHAEL,
GLIKSON MICHAEL
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00204.x
Subject(s) - medicine , lead (geology) , atrial fibrillation , randomized controlled trial , cardiology , fixation (population genetics) , surgery , population , environmental health , geomorphology , geology
Objective: In this prospective, randomized, control study we compared performance of J‐shaped (JL) and straight atrial leads (SL) with active (screw‐in) fixation mechanism, over a 5‐year follow‐up period.Subjects and Methods: A total of 208 consecutive patients were randomized for implantation with a Medtronic 4568 JL model (n = 103) versus a Medtronic 4068 SL model (n = 105), and all lead‐related measurements and complications were recorded.Results: Lead‐related complications occurred in JL and SL with similar frequency (6% and 9%, respectively, P = 0.45). Lead dislodgment occurred in 8 (7.8%) cases in SL versus none in JL (P = 0.004). Lead malfunction and excessive pacing thresholds without macrodislodgment occurred more frequently in JL (11; 10.7%) than in SL (4; 3.8%), P = 0.055. Lead material failure (insulation break) occurred only once in SL at the 5‐year checkup. Most complications occurred during the first year after implantation. Other events occurred in both leads with similar frequency and included: death in 39 and 35, loss of follow‐up in 8 and 6, and development of atrial fibrillation in 9 and 15 patients, respectively. Of those who completed follow‐up, lead impedance and pacing threshold increased significantly in both groups. P wave decreased in SL but not in JL.Conclusion: More dislocations occurred in SL, but were counterbalanced by more lead malfunctions and excessive pacing thresholds in the JL group. Both leads demonstrated minor deterioration in electrical measurements during follow‐up, with only 1 case of lead material failure in SL. Overall, both groups demonstrated favorable lead performance throughout follow‐up.