Premium
Time Dependence of Anodal and Cathodal Refractory Periods in Cardiac Tissue
Author(s) -
BENNETT JONATHAN A.,
ROTH BRADLEY J.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00567.x
Subject(s) - refractory period , medicine , electrode , anode , stimulus (psychology) , stimulation , refractory (planetary science) , biomedical engineering , cardiology , materials science , composite material , chemistry , psychology , psychotherapist
Mehra et al. (PACE 1980; 3:526) observed that immediately after implantation of a pacing electrode in a dog heart, the anodal refractory period (RP) is shorter than the cathodal RP, but after several weeks the anodal RP becomes longer than the cathodal RP. We examine this experiment using numerical simulations based on the bidomain model of cardiac tissue and a Beeler‐Reuter membrane. Our hypothesis is that accumulation of inexcitable tissue around the electrode following implantation causes the effective size of the electrode to increase and that this increase is the mechanism underlying the change in RP. We calculate that the anodal RP is shorter than the cathodal RP for both large and small electrodes. However, for large electrodes the threshold for anode “break” stimulation is greater than 8 mA. Mehra et al. defined RP experimentally as the interval at which the threshold stimulus strength becomes greater than 8 mA. If we restrict the stimulus current in our calculations to less than 8 mA, we exclude anode break stimulation from our calculation of the RP. In that case, our results are consistent with Mehra et al. and suggest that their observation resulted from their definition of RP.