Premium
Initial Clinical Experience with a Fully Automatic In‐Hospital External Cardioverter Defibrillator
Author(s) -
MATTIONI THOMAS A.,
NADEMANEE KOONLAWEE,
BRODSKY MICHAEL,
FISHER JOHN,
RIGGIO DAVID,
ALLEN BYRON,
WELCH SUSAN,
YBARRA RAUL A.,
LIN DONGPING,
DEAN EDNA
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00385.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ventricular tachycardia , supraventricular tachycardia , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , adverse effect , tachycardia , intensive care unit , sudden cardiac death , cardiology , intensive care medicine
Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia remains a significant problem in the in‐hospital setting. Although the probability of survival is closely correlated with the rapidity of a response by qualified personnel, response times can be prolonged, even in specialized care units. In an effort to decrease response time, a fully automatic external cardioverter defibrillator was recently devised. This device was evaluated in the in‐hospital setting to assess safety and efficacy. A total of 79 patients were studied in a multicenter trial. Patients were monitored with fully functional devices in the electrophysiology laboratory (51 patients) and in the cardiac care unit (28 patients). Performance of the device was assessed by comparing automatic responses to any sustained change in cardiac rhythm, either spontaneous or induced, to a retrospective review of stored ECG data and programmed parameters. During a total duration of 964 hours of monitoring, there were 99 episodes of sustained tachycardia. Therapy was appropriately delivered or advised in all episodes. Therapy was advised in one episode of supraventricular tachycardia. There were no episodes of inappropriate therapy delivery. There were no complications or adverse events. The device performed with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98.8% with an average response time of 22 seconds. In conclusion, this automatic external defibrillator was safe, effective, and functioned as designed. Significant improvement in response time to life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the in‐hospital setting would be expected if this technology was widely adopted.