Premium
Measurement of Minute Ventilation with Different DDDR Pacemaker Electrode Configurations
Author(s) -
BONNET JEANLUC,
RITTER PHILIPPE,
PIOGER GUY
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01055.x
Subject(s) - medicine , lead (geology) , ventilation (architecture) , cardiology , population , electrode , anesthesia , physics , environmental health , quantum mechanics , geomorphology , thermodynamics , geology
A rate responsive minute ventilation (VE) pacemaker was implanted in 49 patients (70.8 ± 40.0 years). A Chorus RM 7034 pacemaker was implanted in 43 patients and an Opus RM 4534 in six patients. Four sensor configurations were compared: atrial configuration (bipolar atrial lead) in 34 patients; ventricular configuration (bipolar ventricular lead) in 6 patients; unipolar configuration (double unipolar leads) in 6 patients; and floating configuration (VDD single‐pass lead) in 3 patients. The patients carried out 57 exercise tests in all with cardiopulmonary recording (CPX). Real VE and oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) were recorded by the CPX, the VE measured by the sensor (VEsensor) was recorded in the pacemaker memory. The mean correlation between VE and VEsensor was 0.90 ± 0.08 (P < 0.001) and between VO 2 and VEsensor was 0.86 ± 0.10 (P < 0.001). The mean correlation between VE and VEsensor by configuration type were as follows: atrial configuration = 0.89 ± 0.08; ventricular configuration = 0.95 ± 0.05; unipolar configuration = 0.87 ± 0.14; and floating configuration = 0.88 ± 0.05. In conclusion, VE may be reliably measured using different electrode configurations. A study conducted in a larger population should allow one to conclude that uniploar electrodes can be used in VDDR, AAIR, VVIR, or DDDR modes to measure VE.