Premium
Effects of Respiration Phase on Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold in a Hot Can Electrode System
Author(s) -
YAMANOUCHI YOSHIO,
MOWREY KENT A.,
KROLL MARK W.,
BREWER JAMES E.,
DONOHOO ANN M.,
NIEBAUER MARK J.,
WILKOFF BRUCE L.,
TCHOU PATRICK J.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00180.x
Subject(s) - medicine , defibrillation , cardiology , respiration , electrode , anatomy , chemistry
The impedance of defibrillation pathways is an important determinant of ventricular defibrillation efficacy. The hypothesis in this study was that the respiration phase (end‐inspiration versus end‐expiration) mayalter impedance and/or defibrillation efficacy in a “hot can” electrode system. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) parameters were evaluated at end‐expiration and at end‐inspiration phases in random order by a biphasic waveform in ten anesthetized pigs (body weight: 19.1 ±2.4 kg; heart weight: 97 ± 10g). Pigs were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and ventilated through a Drager SAVrespirator with tidal volume of 400–500 mL. A transvenous defibrillation lead (6 cm long, 6.5 Fr) was inserted into the right ventricular apex. A titanium can electrode (92‐cm 2 surface area) was placed in the left pectoral area. The right ventricular lead was the anode for the first phase and the cathode for the second phase. The DFT was determined by a “down‐up down‐up” protocol. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon matched pair test. The median impedance at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 37.8 ±3.1 Ω and 39.3 ± 3.6 Ω, respectively (P = 0.02). The stored energy at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 5.7 ± 1.9 J and 6.0 ± 1.0 J, respectively (P = 0.594). Shocks delivered at end‐inspiration exhibited a statistically significant increase in electrode impedance in a “hot can” electrode system. The finding that DFT energy was not significantly different at both respiration phases indicates that respiration phase does not significantly affect defibrillation energy requirements.