Premium
Underdetection of Ventricular Tachycardia Using a 40 ms Stability Criterion: Effect of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
Author(s) -
FRANC PIERRE,
KUŚ TERESA,
VINET ALAIN,
ROCQUE PIERRE,
MOLIN FRANCK,
COSTI PAOLO
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05456.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ventricular fibrillation , reset (finance) , ventricular tachycardia , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , tachycardia , anesthesia , economics , financial economics
Inappropriate shocks can complicate cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Among solutions proposed to avoid oversensing are algorithms to reduce inappropriate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) or sinus tachycardia. In patients not on antiarrythmic drugs, an interval stability criterion of 40 ms has been validated with the Medtronic PCD to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from AF. With this algorithm, VT is considered stable if no interval varies from one of the three preceding in tervals by more than 40 ms. If an interval does not fulfill this criterion, the VT event counter is reset to zero. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of underdetection when this criterion is ap plied in patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. We studied 132 sustained monomorphic VTs induced in 42 patients during 101 electrophysiological studies (EPS). EPS were performed without treatment (group I. 24 patients, 44 VTs); on Class Ia drug (group II, 17 patients, 24 VTs); Class Ic drug (group III, 22 patients, 39 VTs); or sotalol (group IV, 17 patients, 25 VTs). The endocardial electrogram of all VT episodes was digitized and the stability algorithm was applied. The reset arrhythmias were distributed among no delay, small, moderate (<10 s) and important (>15 s) delay in VT detection. The relation be tween drug use and reset was analyzed. Beset was found in 86 (65%) of induced VTs. No difference in heart rate or induction mode was shown between reset and nonreset VTs. There was a significative asso ciation between drag use and reset probability (Chi 2 significantly different, P < 0.05). In patients treated with Class Ic drugs, the probability of finding an important delay in VT detection was 12.5% versus 0% in nontreated patients or in patients treated with sotalol. We conclude that a stability criterion of 40 ms is probably safe in nontreated patients but should be used with caution in patients treated with antiarrhythmics, especially in the presence of Class Ic drags.