Premium
Immediate and Day‐to‐Day Reproducibility of the Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Author(s) -
PAQUAY JEAN LOUIS,
ZIMMERMANN MARC,
MERMILLOD BERNADETTE,
ADAMEC RICHARD
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb06515.x
Subject(s) - medicine , signal averaged electrocardiogram , reproducibility , coronary artery disease , qrs complex , cardiology , electrocardiography , statistics , mathematics
The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the immediate (5 minutes) and short‐term (1 day) reproducibility of the signal‐averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) in patients with coronary artery disease. A total of 59 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (50 male, 9 female, mean age 59 ± 13 years) were included. Analysis was performed using a commercially available system with high‐pass filters of 25, 40, and 80 Hz without any change in electrode position. The following time‐domain parameters were measured: (1) total filtered QRS duration; (2) duration of high‐frequency low‐amplitude signals (HFLA); and (3) root‐mean‐square voltage of the terminal 40 ms of the QRS complex (RMS40). Correlation between pairs of measurements was excellent, ranging from 0.91–0.99 for QRS and HFLA duration, and from 0.83–0.98 for RMS40 value. However, the range of differences was wide for all parameters, especially at 25 and 80 Hz, revealing marked individual variations in selected cases. The immediate reproducibility of an initially normal SAECG was 95% at 25 Hz, 100% at 40 Hz, and 81 % at 80 Hz; figures for an initially abnormal SAECG were 89%, 91 %, and 93%, respectively, and the coefficient of agreement kappa was highest at 40 Hz than at 25 or 80 Hz. Discordant results were most frequently observed in patients with borderline values, or in cases with nonsimilar residual noise levels. In conclusion, the immediate and day‐to‐day reproducibility of the SAECG is excellent in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease. However, individual variations are observed in selected cases, leading to modification in interpretation of the result. For this reason, individual reproducibility should be considered before evaluating the effect of any therapeutic intervention on the SAECG, especially in patients with borderline values of the quantitative parameters of the SAECG.