Premium
Atrial Flutter Mapping and Ablation II. Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Flutter Circuits
Author(s) -
Barol S. Serge,
COSIO FRANCISCO G.,
ARRIBAS FERNANDO,
LÓPEZGIL MARÍA,
GONZÁLEZ H. DANIEL
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03394.x
Subject(s) - atrial flutter , medicine , ablation , flutter , reentry , cardiology , coronary sinus , atrial fibrillation , inferior vena cava , catheter ablation , radiofrequency ablation , engineering , aerodynamics , aerospace engineering
The definition of the anatomical substrate of reentry in at rial flutter has allowed the recognition of narrow, critical areas of the circuit, where radiofrequencv ablation can interrupt reentry. In common flutter the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve appears the best target, but ablation between the coronary sinus and tricuspid valve can also be effective in some cases. In atypical flutter using the same circuit as common flutter in a “clockwise” direction, ablation of the same isthmus is effective. Flutter interruption is the main objective, but it does not mean complete isthmus ablation. If flutter remains inducible, new applications are delivered in the isthmus, until it is made noninducible. Complications are rare. Despite attaining noninducibility, flutter may recur, and new procedures may he needed to prevent recurrence. Atrial fibrillation can occur in up to 30% of the cases during follow‐up, but it is generally well controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs, that were ineffective to treat flutter before ablation. In reentry circuits based on surgical atrial scars, ablation of an isthmus between the scar and the inferior vena cava can also be effective. Left atrial circuits are not known well enough to guide successful ablation.