z-logo
Premium
Prospective Evaluation of Infrahisal Second‐Degree AV Block Induced by Atrial Pacing in the Presence of Chronic Bundle Branch Block and Syncope
Author(s) -
PETRAČ DUBRAVKO,
RADIĆ BERISLAV,
BIRTIĆ KREŠIMIR,
GIUROVIĆ JOSIP
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03360.x
Subject(s) - medicine , syncope (phonology) , cardiology , block (permutation group theory) , heart block , electrocardiography , geometry , mathematics
The value of nonfunctional infrahisal second‐degree atrioventricular (AV) block induced by incremental atrial pacing was prospectively examined in 192 patients with chronic bundle branch block (BBB) and syncope. We compared 174 (91 %) patients with normal response to atrial pacing (Group I) to 18 (9%) patients with atrial pacing induced nonfunctional infrahisal second‐degree AV block (Group II). Patients in group I had higher incidence of organic heart disease, ventricular tachycardia induction, and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively), while patients in group II had higher incidence of primary conduction disease and prolonged H‐V intervals (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001). During mean follow‐up period of 65 ± 34 months for group I, and 68 ± 35 months for group II, a development of spontaneous second‐ or third‐degree AV block was higher in group II (14/18 [78%]), than in group I (15/174 [9%]) (P < 0.001). The site of AV block was infrahisal in all patients in group II, and in 10 of 15 patients in group I. Because of the prophylactic pacing in all patients in group II, the incidence of sudden death was similar among the two groups, but patients in group I had higher incidence of cardiac death (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with chronic BBB and syncope, a nonfunctional infrahisal AV block induced by incremental atrial pacing identified patients with particularly high risk of development of spontaneous infrahisal AV block. Therefore, permanent cardiac pacing is absolutely indicated in these patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here