Premium
Influence of Internal Current and Pacing Current on Pacemaker Longevity
Author(s) -
SCHUCHERT ANDREAS,
KUCK KARLHEINZ
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01344.x
Subject(s) - longevity , medicine , battery (electricity) , current (fluid) , pulse (music) , cardiology , electrical engineering , voltage , power (physics) , gerontology , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering
The effects of lower pulse amplitude on battery current and pacemaker longevity were studied comparing the new, small‐sized VVI pacemaker, Minix 8341, with the former model, Pasys 8329. Battery current was telemetrically measured at 0.8. 1.6, 2.5, and 5.0 V pulse amplitude and 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 msec pulse duration. Internal current was assumed to be equal to the battery current at 0.8 V and 0.05 msec. Pacing current was calculated subtracting internal current from battery current. The Minix pacemaker had a significantly lower battery current because of a lower internal current (Minix: 4.1 ±0.1 μA; Pasys: 16.1 ± 0.1 μA); pacing current of both units was similar. At 0.5 msec pulse duration, the programming from 5.0‐2.5 V puise amplitude resulted in a greater relative reduction of battery current in the newer pacemaker (51% vs 25%). Projected longevity of each pacemaker was 7.9 years at 5.0 V and 0.5 msec. The programming from 5.0–2.5 V extended the projected longevity by 2.3 years (Pasys) and by 7.1 years (Minix). The longevity was negligibly longer after programming to 1.6 V. Conclusion: Extension of pacemaker longevity can be achieved with the programming to 2.5 V or less if the connected pacemakers need a low internal current for their circuitry.