Premium
Comparative Atrioventricular Node Properties After Radiofrequency Ablation and Operative Therapy of Atrioventricular Node Reentry
Author(s) -
NATALE ANDREA,
WATHEN MARK,
WOLFE KEVIN,
YEE RAYMOND,
GUIRAUDON GERARD M.,
KLEIN GEORGE J.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb04570.x
Subject(s) - reentry , medicine , atrioventricular node , effective refractory period , ablation , radiofrequency ablation , refractory period , cardiology , dissection (medical) , anesthesia , tachycardia , surgery
The anatomical substrate for atrioventricular (AV) node reentry is unclear. To gain insights into the mechanism of cure of AV node reentry by nonpharmacological techniques, we compared AV node properties in 53 patients undergoing operative therapy (perinodal dissection) and 43 undergoing radiofrequency ablation (28 posterior approach, 15 anterior approach). Anterior radiofrequency ablation was associated with significant AH prolongation (62 ±18 msec vs 136 ± 64 msec, P < 0.0001), loss of “fast” pathway physiology, and no change in the anterograde refractory period of the AV node (273 ± 24 msec vs 268 ± 28 msec, P = NS). Posterior radiofrequency ablation did not change the AH interval (67 ± 17 msec vs 68 ± 17 msec, P = NS), prolonged AV node effective refractory period (275 ± 48 msec vs 320 ± 55 msec, P < 0.0001), and was associated with loss of “slow pathway” physiology. Operative treatment prolonged the AH interval (66 ±18 msec vs 83 ± 37 msec, P < 0.0001) and the AV node effective refractory period (264 ± 52 msec vs 364 ±112 msec, P < 0.0001), and affected dual pathway physiology inconsistently. These data support the view that the “fast” and “slow” pathways are distinct perinodal entities that can be selectively ablated. The operative approach causes more diffuse and variable injury to the AV node region.