Premium
The Importance of Timing Muscle Contraction in Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty
Author(s) -
GEDDES L.A.,
JANAS W.,
BOURLAND J.D.,
COOK J.,
HINDS M.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb02332.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , cardiomyoplasty , beat (acoustics) , stroke volume , contraction (grammar) , anesthesia , stimulus (psychology) , blood pressure , heart rate , heart failure , psychology , physics , acoustics , psychotherapist
This acute dynamic cardiomyoplasty (CMP)study used ten dogs (weight range 21–32 kg)and was designed to determine the importance of the train of stimuli initiation time when applied to the thoracodorsal nerve, which innen‐ates the latissinius dorsi (LD)muscle that is wrapped around the ventricles. Using the P wave of the cardiac electrogram to trigger a special delay circuit, the stimulus train could be initiated from the apex of the R wave to any time throughout and at the end of the isovolumic period, signaled by opening of the aortic valve. The cardiac electrogram (which contained the R wave), left ventricular pressure (LVP), aortic flow velocity (AFV), beat‐by‐beat stroke volume (SV), femoral artery pressure, and the envelope of the stimulus train were recorded as the onset of the stimulus train was varied from the R wave to the end of the isovolumic period with a pumping ratio of one LD contraction for every seven ventricular contractions. In four dogs there was a pronounced increase in the augmentation in LVP, AFV, and SV when the stimulus train was initiated later than 40 msec after the first peak of the R wave. In five dogs the augmentation in LVP, AFV, and SV was not as clearly apparent, although all of these dogs exhibited an optimal train delay. Data were not obtained on one dog due to an anomalous LD muscle blood supply. For all of the dogs, the optimum train delay from the R wave averaged 58 msec (range 40–80 msec). The average augmentation in SV was 26% (range 13%–45%). The same muscle‐wrap tightness was used in all dogs. In one dog, the muscle‐wrap tightness was varied, and by tightening the wrap the SV augmentation increased from 17% to 27%. For all dogs the range of augmentation in SV (13%–45%)perhaps represents variations in muscle‐wrap tightness, which may be a major uncontrolled factor in dynamic CMP.