Premium
Nonuniformity of AH Intervals During Stimulation at Different Left Atrial Sites
Author(s) -
SUZUKI FUMIO,
HARADA TOMOO,
KAWARA TOKUHIRO,
TANAKA KAZUSHI,
HIRAO KENZO,
HIEJIMA KAZUMASA,
LEHMANN MICHAEL H.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb00993.x
Subject(s) - medicine , coronary sinus , stimulation , left atrium , cardiology , atrium (architecture) , atrial fibrillation
Studies in humans have found left atrial stimulation via the coronary sinus (CS) to elicit significantly shorter atrium‐His (AH) intervals as compared to right atrial stimulation, but whether pacing at dijferent left atrial sites (anterior vs posterior left atrium, i.e., far distal vs proximal CSJ affects the AH interval has not been studied. Hence, in 22 patients, we compared the effects of stimulation from various atriai sites, including anterior high right atrium (HRA), distal CS, mid‐CS, and proximal CS, on; stimulus‐atrium (SA), AH, and stimuIus‐His intervals on the His bundle electrogram. Paced cycle length differed for each patient (range 900–350 msec, mean 532 ± 140 msec), but conduction intervals from different atrial sites were compared using identical cycle length in each patient. The mean SA intervals were 34 ± 10 msec, 57 ± 10 msec, 44 ± 11 msec, and 32 ± 8 msec with stimulation, respectively, from HRA, distal CS, mid‐CS. and proximal CS (each significantly different except for HRA vs proximal CSJ. The mean AH intervals were 123 ± 23 msec, 104 ± 28 msec, 95 ± 15 msec, and 90 ± 18 msec with stimulation, respectively, from HRA, distal CS, mid‐CS, and proximal CS (each significantly different except for mid‐CS vs proximal CSJ. In 13 patients, the discrepancy in AH intervals during distal versus proximal CS stimulation was > 15 msec; in 9 patients this difference was only < 10 msec, considered within the range of measurement error. Thus, in a significant portion of patients, discrepant AH intervals were demonstrated during stimulation from the distal versus proximal CS. These previously undescribed observations suggest that electrophysiological studies on atrioventricular nodal conduction that involve left atrial stimulation must take into account actual location of the stimulation site (anterior or posterior) in order to properly interpret the findings.