Premium
Does Dual Chamber or Atrial Pacing Prevent Atrial Fibrillation? The Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
LAMAS GERVASIO A.,
III N. MARK ESTES,
SCHNELLER STANLEY,
FLAKER GREGORY C.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03112.x
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , randomized controlled trial , cardiology , single chamber , dual (grammatical number) , cardiac pacing , art , literature
Partially due to recent reports that cardiac antiarrhythmic therapy may have adverse effects on patient survival, clinicians have become more interested in the nonpharmacological prevention of atrial fibrillation. There is a large body of literature that suggests that the rate of development of atrial fibrillation in paced sick sinus syndrome patients is much lower in those patients who have received an atrial‐based system, rather than a VVI system. However, all the published studies to date are retrospective, and fraught with potential bias favoring the AAI or DDD group. The authors strongly believe that the only way to determine if these suggestive but uncertain retrospective analyses are correct is to apply the same scientific rigor to this problem as has been applied to many other problems in cardiovascular medicine and perform a prospective randomized trial. A proposed trial design is discussed.