Premium
Active Fixation of Endocardial Pacing Leads: The Preferred Method of Pediatric Pacing
Author(s) -
FRIEDMAN RICHARD A.,
MOAK JEFFREY P.,
GARSON ARTHUR
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02857.x
Subject(s) - medicine , fixation (population genetics) , lead (geology) , subclavian vein , cardiac pacing , implant , surgery , cardiology , population , catheter , environmental health , geomorphology , geology
Pacing system failure due to lead related problems may necessitate repositioning or explanation of the problem lead. Pediatric patients with permanent pacemakers have additional considerations that necessitate revision or explantation of pacing leads. Active fixation type leads appear to offer the physician advantages over passive fixation leads that may make them the lead of choice for use in children. We reviewed our experience with active fixation type leads to determine whether the ease with which these leads could be revised or explanted justified recommending their use in our patients. Eleven patients underwent 13 lead revisions. The time from implant to revision was a mean of 12.3 months. Six patients had previously undergone repair of a congenital heart defect. Modes of pacing were: DDD (seven); AAI (three); and VVI (one). Exposed, isodiametric leads accounted for 11/13 leads. Leads were successfully explanted in nine cases and repositioned in four cases. The only lead that could not be revised and resulted in retention was a nonisodiametric, retractable helix lead at the junction of the subclavian vein and clavicle. We conclude isodiametric active fixation leads can be safely repositioned or explanted in children and should he considered the preferred method for endocardial pacing in children.