Premium
Long‐Term Prognostic Significance and Electrophysiological Evolution of Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
Author(s) -
PAGI FRANCO,
FINZI ANDREA,
VALENTINI ROMANO,
AMBROSINI FRANCESCO,
LOTTO ANTONIO
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb05364.x
Subject(s) - medicine , intraventricular conduction , cardiology , myocardial infarction , incidence (geometry) , infarction , bundle branch block , heart failure , sudden death , electrocardiography , anesthesia , physics , optics
Fifty‐nine patients with post‐infarctional, isolated intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD) who survived the acute stage of myocardial infarction were followed up after hospital discharge for a mean period of 11.4 ± 4.8 months. Fourteen patients (24%) had HV interval prolongation (>55 ms) during AMI (group A), and 45 patients had normal HV intervais (76%. group B). His bundle recordings were repeated during follow‐up in 48 survivors after a mean period of 7.2 ± 0.7 months. Infranodal conduction delay in the acute stage of infarction was correlated with a higher incidence of heart failure during AMI (78% of patients in group A vs 22% in group B, p < 0.01), and with higher rate of cardiac mortality during follow‐up (50% in group A vs 13% in group B. p < 0.01). Survivors of group A showed a higher functional NYHA class, a higher incidence of CHF, and a higher prevalence of complex ventricular arrhythmias at Holter monitoring. No statistically significant difference in late sudden death was evident between the two groups of patients, and the global incidence of late AV block was 2%. At repeat His bundle recording no significant change (>5 ms) in HV interval could be demonstrated in comparison to the acute phase recording, neither in patients with prolonged nor in patients with normal HV time. We conclude that HV prolongation in patients with isolated, post‐infarctional IVCD is correlated with a worse prognosis, both during acute infarction and during the follow‐up period, which presumably reflects wider anatomic damage in comporison to patients with normal HV time. The low incidence of late AV block and the electrophysiological demonstration of the stability of infranodal conduction several months after AMI indicate that these patients do not require permanent prophylactic pacing after acute myocardial infarction.