z-logo
Premium
Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter?
Author(s) -
BALI TURAN G.,
CAKICI NUSRET,
YAN XUEMIN STERLING,
ZHANG ZHE
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the journal of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 18.151
H-Index - 299
eISSN - 1540-6261
pISSN - 0022-1082
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00750.x
Subject(s) - volatility (finance) , portfolio , market liquidity , stock (firearms) , financial economics , econometrics , economics , monetary economics , geography , archaeology
Goyal and Santa‐Clara (2003) find a significantly positive relation between the equal‐weighted average stock volatility and the value‐weighted portfolio returns on the NYSE/AMEX/Nasdaq stocks for the period of 1963:08 to 1999:12. We show that this result is driven by small stocks traded on the Nasdaq, and is in part due to a liquidity premium. In addition, their result does not hold for the extended sample of 1963:08 to 2001:12 and for the NYSE/AMEX and NYSE stocks. More importantly, we find no evidence of a significant link between the value‐weighted portfolio returns and the median and value‐weighted average stock volatility.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here