Premium
Competition and Coalition among Underwriters: The Decision to Join a Syndicate
Author(s) -
SONG WEILING
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the journal of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 18.151
H-Index - 299
eISSN - 1540-6261
pISSN - 0022-1082
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00704.x
Subject(s) - syndicate , underwriting , business , investment banking , competition (biology) , investment (military) , finance , stock (firearms) , financial system , mechanical engineering , ecology , politics , political science , law , biology , engineering
This paper studies the decision of lead investment banks to organize hybrid syndicates (commercial banks participating as co‐managers) versus pure investment bank syndicates. The findings show that hybrid underwriting issues are more challenging to float. Compared to pure investment bank syndicates, hybrid syndicates serve clients that are smaller, have lower common stock rankings and less prior access to the capital markets, rely more on bank loans, and invest less capital but issue larger amounts, which indicates that commercial banks' participation enhances hybrid services. Moreover, lead investment banks tend to invite banks' participation when clients exhibit higher loyalty in reusing their services.