Premium
Public Administration as Pragmatic, Democratic, and Objective
Author(s) -
Hildebrand David L.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
public administration review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.721
H-Index - 139
eISSN - 1540-6210
pISSN - 0033-3352
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00857.x
Subject(s) - pragmatism , objectivity (philosophy) , democracy , politics , administration (probate law) , political science , public administration , value (mathematics) , epistemology , law and economics , sociology , law , philosophy , computer science , machine learning
In the foregoing essay, Patricia M. Shields argues that public administration and administrators should support a much greater incorporation of classical pragmatism than has been the case to date. This paper supports that conclusion by focusing on classical pragmatism’s central benefit to public administration: its ability to provide the field with a claim to objectivity that it badly needs, but which Shields barely mentions. It shows how objectivity is closely connected to a pragmatic conception of democracy, and how this conception of democracy is diametrically opposed to one built on a fact/value (or administration/politics) dichotomy.