Premium
Cautions on the Use of the SERVQUAL Measure to Assess the Quality of Information Systems Services
Author(s) -
Dyke Thomas P.,
Prybutok Victor R.,
Kappelman Leon A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
decision sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.238
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1540-5915
pISSN - 0011-7315
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00911.x
Subject(s) - servqual , reliability (semiconductor) , discriminant validity , quality (philosophy) , validity , computer science , measure (data warehouse) , service quality , marketing , psychology , knowledge management , business , psychometrics , service (business) , data mining , patient satisfaction , quantum mechanics , clinical psychology , power (physics) , philosophy , physics , internal consistency , epistemology
The SERVQUAL questionnaire (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988) is one of the preeminent instruments for measuring the quality of services as perceived by the customer. In a recent Decision Sciences article, Kettinger and Lee (1995) suggested the use of a modified SERVQUAL instrument to assess the quality of the services supplied by an information services provider. However, a number of problems with the SERVQUAL instrument are discussed in the literature. This article provides an illustrative example utilizing data collected from 138 executive and information systems professional customers of a multibillion dollar information services provider in order to examine the validity and reliability of Kettinger and Lee's (1995) modified SERVQUAL instrument. Results of analyses do not confirm the findings of Kettinger and Lee. Moreover, it appears that the use of difference scores in calculating SERVQUAL contributes to problems with the reliability, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and predictive validity of the measure. These findings suggest that caution should be exercised in the use of SERVQUAL scores and that further work is needed in the development of measures for assessing the quality of information services.