Premium
COMPARING IMPUTED AND ACTUAL UTILITY FUNCTIONS IN A COMPETITIVE BIDDING SETTING
Author(s) -
Barnes Jim D.,
Reinmuth James E.
Publication year - 1976
Publication title -
decision sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.238
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1540-5915
pISSN - 0011-7315
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1976.tb00720.x
Subject(s) - bidding , computer science , function (biology) , operations research , von neumann–morgenstern utility theorem , von neumann architecture , microeconomics , expected utility hypothesis , economics , mathematical economics , mathematics , evolutionary biology , biology , operating system
The main focus of this article is to compare utility functions derived by the Von Neumann‐Morgenstern conceptual apparatus with those imputed through actual pricing behavior. The study is cast in a competitive bidding setting in the oil drilling industry. A version of the Friedman bidding model is used to generate separate bidding models for two drilling contractors. From the actual bids submitted by the contractors and those generated by the model, one can construct each contractor's imputed utility function. An examination of a contractor's derived and imputed utility functions over a common range of outcomes then provides a diagnostic check on the veracity of the Von Neumann‐Morgenstern theory as a prescriptive model of executive behavior.