z-logo
Premium
Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition
Author(s) -
Tavits Margit
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
american journal of political science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.347
H-Index - 170
eISSN - 1540-5907
pISSN - 0092-5853
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00243.x
Subject(s) - credibility , sign (mathematics) , pragmatism , politics , competition (biology) , positive economics , political science , core (optical fiber) , value (mathematics) , political economy , economics , law and economics , epistemology , law , computer science , philosophy , mathematical analysis , ecology , telecommunications , mathematics , machine learning , biology
This article investigates the electoral effect of party policy shifts. I argue that whether party policy shifts are damaging or rewarding depends on whether the shift occurs in the pragmatic or principled issue domain. On pragmatic issues, voters value “getting things done.” Policy shifts in this domain signal responsiveness to the changing environment and are likely to be rewarded. Principled issues, however, concern core beliefs and values. Any policy shift in this domain is a sign of inconsistency and lack of credibility, which is likely to lead to voter withdrawal. These arguments are supported by evidence from 23 advanced democracies over a period of 40 years.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here