Premium
FROM EXPERIENCE: Disruptive Innovation and the Need for Disruptive Intellectual Asset Strategy
Author(s) -
Lindsay Jeff,
Hopkins Mike
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of product innovation management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 144
eISSN - 1540-5885
pISSN - 0737-6782
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00715.x
Subject(s) - disruptive innovation , intellectual property , business , asset (computer security) , marketing , open innovation , corporation , competitive advantage , industrial organization , finance , computer security , computer science , operating system
Disruption has become a popular business term, yet it is often used so loosely as to convey almost nothing of substance. Here a largely neglected factor is addressed: the role of intellectual assets in securing opportunities for or averting threats from disruptive innovations. While the literature explains why the decision‐making systems in large established companies cause difficulty in responding effectively to disruptive innovation the generation of intellectual assets (e.g., patents, publications, trademarks) typically is not subject to the same cultural and structural barriers. Though it may be difficult to convince a business to invest millions in pursuit of a speculative disruptive innovation, it is much easier for a small team to gain support in pursuing low‐cost intellectual assets in the name of mitigating potential threats. A two‐pronged approach is proposed that builds on the authors' experience at Kimberly‐Clark Corporation in dealing with disruptive threats and opportunities. The approach calls for generation of intellectual assets, often using small proactive teams, to (1) protect an existing business by reducing competitive risks from disruptive innovation, including the risk of new products with disruptive potential and the risk of associated competitive patents that might limit one's response; and (2) prepare for future new and disruptive business opportunities that could be protected or strengthened by the intellectual assets generated. Kimberly‐Clark's growing experience with this approach suggests that it may be a valuable component of one's strategy for innovation and protection of the business.