z-logo
Premium
Argumentative Discourse in L2 German: A Sociocognitive Perspective on the Development of Facework Strategies
Author(s) -
DIPPOLD DORIS
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the modern language journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.486
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1540-4781
pISSN - 0026-7902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01175.x
Subject(s) - argumentative , german , perspective (graphical) , interlanguage , linguistics , language proficiency , psychology , argument (complex analysis) , face negotiation theory , task (project management) , field (mathematics) , animacy , computer science , cognitive psychology , face (sociological concept) , mathematics education , artificial intelligence , pure mathematics , economics , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , management , mathematics
This study contributes to the growing field of research on interlanguage pragmatic development with a study on the development of argumentative discourse ability by second‐language learners of German. I will be focusing on  facework —that is, the use of verbal strategies that allow the speaker to have his or her social identities, particular personal qualities, and attributes validated by others. The study approaches the data, which were gathered from learners of German at 3 levels of proficiency, from the perspective of sequential and preference organisation. The analysis shows that argumentative sequences develop from a simple 2‐ or 3‐turn structure, which consists of merely 1 “core” adjacency pair (assessment/opinion–agreement/disagreement), to being extended by postsequences and insertion sequences. It is only for learners of higher proficiency, however, that these extensions serve to further the argument rather than merely building on agreement. When disagreeing, learners increasingly use agreement turns to sharpen forthcoming disagreement or use their interlocutors’ turns to serve that purpose. These developments are then explained from a sociocognitive perspective. I will argue that developments are due to learners overcoming processing constraints as proficiency progresses as well as their changing frames of reference for the task.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here