Premium
Hacks, Flacks, and Counter‐Attacks: Cigarette Advertising, Sponsored Research, and Controversies
Author(s) -
Pollay Richard W.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of social issues
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.618
H-Index - 122
eISSN - 1540-4560
pISSN - 0022-4537
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02431.x
Subject(s) - advertising , tobacco industry , argument (complex analysis) , suspect , perception , marketing , advertising campaign , public relations , mythology , political science , psychology , business , medicine , criminology , law , history , neuroscience , classics
The tobacco industry promotes friendly “experts” and uses public relations tactics to produce uncertainty around research results that threaten it. This inhibits public policies responsive to these research findings. These tactics, long used against medical science, are now being used to counter the studies challenging to the myth that cigarette advertising is of no import. The numerous weaknesses of the industry‐advanced argument are discussed, drawing particularly on the literature of consumer behavior, marketing, and advertising. The vast preponderance of evidence indicates that cigarette advertising plays a meaningful role in influencing the perceptions, attitudes, and smoking behavior of youth. Denials of these effects, without brand new and compelling evidence, are highly suspect.