Premium
Neonatal Euthanasia: Attributions of Students and Nurses
Author(s) -
Sugarman David B.,
Montvilo Robin K.,
Matarese Colette J.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of social issues
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.618
H-Index - 122
eISSN - 1540-4560
pISSN - 0022-4537
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01575.x
Subject(s) - attribution , nursing , medicine , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , critically ill , psychology , family medicine , resuscitation , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , social psychology
An attributional analysis of neonatal euthanasia was undertaken in two studies to compare the responsibility attributions of nursing and non‐nursing students (Study 1) and nurses (Study 2) toward a physician for a critically ill neonate's death. In both studies, vignettes about a newborn's death differed with respect to the physician's treatment of the critically ill newborn. In the student study, the physician was attributed the least responsibility for the newborn's death when cardiopulmonary resuscitation was attempted but failed, followed by the physician's issuance of either a “Do Not Resuscitate” order or an order to turn off the infant's respirator. Greatest responsibility was attributed to the physician when he ordered the infant's nutritional and hydration support to be terminated. In addition, the student's major (nursing vs. non‐nursing) and the nursing student's educational cohort impacted the level of physician responsibility attributed. In contrast, the nurses' study found that the termination of nutritional and hydrational support was viewed as different from the physician's other three actions.