Premium
The Risk‐Sharing Implications of Disaster Insurance Funds
Author(s) -
Boulatov Alex,
Dieckmann Stephan
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of risk and insurance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1539-6975
pISSN - 0022-4367
DOI - 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01466.x
Subject(s) - business , context (archaeology) , actuarial science , casualty insurance , auto insurance risk selection , risk pool , property insurance , risk aversion (psychology) , reinsurance , general insurance , insurance policy , economics , financial economics , expected utility hypothesis , paleontology , biology
We study the risk‐sharing implications that arise from introducing a disaster insurance fund to the cat insurance market. Such a form of intervention can increase efficiency in the private market, and our design of disaster insurance suggests a prominent role of catastrophe reinsurance. The model predicts buyers will increase their demand in the private market, and the seller will lower prices to such an extent that their revenues decrease upon introduction of disaster insurance. We test two predictions in the context of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). It is already known that the introduction of TRIA led to negative abnormal returns in the insurance industry. In addition, we show this negative effect is stronger for larger and for low‐risk‐averse firms—two results that are consistent with our model. The seller’s risk aversion plays an important role in quantifying such feedback effects, and we point toward possible distortions in which a firm may even be overhedged upon introduction of disaster insurance.