z-logo
Premium
Implicit Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power and Mobile Phone Base Stations: Support for the Affect Heuristic
Author(s) -
Siegrist Michael,
Keller Carmen,
Cousin MarieEve
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
risk analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.972
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1539-6924
pISSN - 0272-4332
DOI - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00797.x
Subject(s) - implicit association test , affect (linguistics) , mobile phone , psychology , implicit attitude , social psychology , phone , perception , risk perception , compliance (psychology) , power (physics) , test (biology) , heuristic , nuclear power , applied psychology , cognitive psychology , computer science , communication , artificial intelligence , telecommunications , linguistics , philosophy , physics , paleontology , ecology , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , biology
The implicit association test (IAT) measures automatic associations. In the present research, the IAT was adapted to measure implicit attitudes toward technological hazards. In Study 1, implicit and explicit attitudes toward nuclear power were examined. Implicit measures (i.e., the IAT) revealed negative attitudes toward nuclear power that were not detected by explicit measures (i.e., a questionnaire). In Study 2, implicit attitudes toward EMF (electro‐magnetic field) hazards were examined. Results showed that cell phone base stations and power lines are judged to be similarly risky and, further, that base stations are more closely related to risk concepts than home appliances are. No differences between experts and lay people were observed. Results of the present studies are in line with the affect heuristic proposed by Slovic and colleagues. Affect seems to be an important factor in risk perception.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here