Premium
Adjusting Triangular Distributions for Judgmental Bias
Author(s) -
Hudak David G.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
risk analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.972
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1539-6924
pISSN - 0272-4332
DOI - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00072.x
Subject(s) - percentile , range (aeronautics) , monte carlo method , point estimation , point (geometry) , statistics , triangular distribution , missile , distribution (mathematics) , econometrics , mathematics , computer science , uniform distribution (continuous) , engineering , mathematical analysis , geometry , aerospace engineering
The common problem in risk analysis of correctly specifying a probability distribution about an estimate in situations when few data are available is examined. In the absence of data, experts are sometimes used to give a lowest and highest conceivable estimate. Triangular distributions are well suited for these situations when only a low, high, and most likely estimate are given. A problem, however, exists from the failure to adjust for biases when estimating extreme values. Various types of biases, which narrow the range of extreme estimates, are explored. A method is suggested for accounting for these biases by placing extreme estimates at specified percentile points rather than endpoints of a triangular distribution. Since most Monte Carlo models require end points of a triangular distribution, a closed‐form expression for identifying the end points given two percentile points and a most likely point is derived. This method has been used extensively in developing cost risk estimates for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO).