Premium
Clinical predictors of prophylaxis use prior to the onset of acute venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER)
Author(s) -
KUCHER N.,
SPIRK D.,
KALKA C.,
MAZZOLAI L.,
NOBEL D.,
BANYAI M.,
FRAUCHIGER B.,
BOUNAMEAUX H.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.947
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 1538-7836
pISSN - 1538-7933
DOI - 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03172.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary embolism , odds ratio , confidence interval , deep vein , venous thromboembolism , intensive care unit , venous thrombosis , surgery , thrombosis
Summary. Background: We investigated clinical predictors of appropriate prophylaxis prior to the onset of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: In 14 Swiss hospitals, 567 consecutive patients (306 medical, 261 surgical) with acute VTE and hospitalization < 30 days prior to the VTE event were enrolled. Results: Prophylaxis was used in 329 (58%) patients within 30 days prior to the VTE event. Among the medical patients, 146 (48%) received prophylaxis, and among the surgical patients, 183 (70%) received prophylaxis ( P < 0.001). The indication for prophylaxis was present in 262 (86%) medical patients and in 217 (83%) surgical patients. Among the patients with an indication for prophylaxis, 135 (52%) of the medical patients and 165 (76%) of the surgical patients received prophylaxis ( P < 0.001). Admission to the intensive care unit [odds ratio (OR) 3.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94–5.57], recent surgery (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.51–3.44), bed rest > 3 days (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.45–3.09), obesity (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03–3.90), prior deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.31–2.24) and prior pulmonary embolism (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05–2.26) were independent predictors of prophylaxis. In contrast, cancer (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89–1.25), age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.01), acute heart failure (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.79–1.63) and acute respiratory failure (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89–1.59) were not predictive of prophylaxis. Conclusions: Although an indication for prophylaxis was present in most patients who suffered acute VTE, almost half did not receive any form of prophylaxis. Future efforts should focus on the improvement of prophylaxis for hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with cancer, acute heart or respiratory failure, and in the elderly.