z-logo
Premium
Market Rules and Spatial Outcomes: Insights from the Corporate Restructuring of U.S. Food Retailing
Author(s) -
Wrigley Neil
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
geographical analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.773
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1538-4632
pISSN - 0016-7363
DOI - 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00983.x
Subject(s) - restructuring , consolidation (business) , leverage (statistics) , competition (biology) , market economy , investment (military) , mergers and acquisitions , business , economics , industrial organization , economic geography , economic system , accounting , political science , finance , politics , ecology , machine learning , computer science , law , biology
In this paper a study of the corporate restructuring of the U.S. food retail industry, during and following the period of regulatory relaxation and high‐leverage capital transformations of the 1980s, is used to interrogate the complex relationships between market regulation, investment regimes, corporate strategies, and spatial outcomes. It is shown that changes in the “rules” governing investment and competition in the United States in the 1980s triggered countervailing spatial processes in the food retail industry. Those processes took more than a decade to work themselves through, but by the late 1990s a radically altered corporate landscape was beginning to emerge. In particular, consolidation of the industry had finally gained momentum–creating an industry whose leading firms are likely by 2002 to have a market share double the level of the early 1990s. The paper concludes by considering the insights which a consideration of corporate restructuring and regulation in this U.S. industry offers for some important areas of conceptual debate in economic geography. In particular, it is argued that industries in which capital structure transformations of the firm must be confronted and treated as a central issue have an intrinsic, but until recently neglected, importance in theoretical debate in the discipline.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here